2003 MCC Smart vs. 2006 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tazz is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Tazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Tazz weights approximately 380 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Tazz. (103 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2006 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart | Tazz |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1296 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 103 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |