2003 MCC Smart vs. 2010 Lexus ES
To start off, 2010 Lexus ES is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus ES (272 HP) has 199 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus ES weights approximately 665 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lexus ES (344 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2010 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2010 Lexus ES | |
Make | MCC | Lexus |
Model | Smart | ES |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 272 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 344 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |