2003 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1570 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | MCC | Fisker |
| Model | Smart | Karma |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 36 L |
