2003 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Falcon (265 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 782 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Falcon (409 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2011 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2011 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | MCC | Ford |
| Model | Smart | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 265 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 409 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1757 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4955 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 68 L |
