2003 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer (148 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer (196 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Smart | Lancer |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 196 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 59 L |