2003 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (161 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (360 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | MCC | Chevrolet |
Model | Smart | Cruze |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 16.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 59 L |