2003 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | MCC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Smart | R |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3216 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 80 L |
