2003 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Nissan NV

To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (317 HP) has 211 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 1691 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Nissan NV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Nissan NV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (521 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2012 Nissan NV has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan NV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: