2003 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 508 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (161 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | MCC | Peugeot |
Model | Smart | 508 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2815 mm |