2003 MCC Smart vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 525 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | MCC | Mini |
| Model | Smart | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2467 mm |
