2003 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 585 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz C | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | C | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.5 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.3 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 50 L |
