2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 200 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
| Model | CLK GTR | 200 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
