2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 950 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLK GTR | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
