2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 451 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK GTR | C30 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |