2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK (167 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (110 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK (245 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: