2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (167 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (245 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | CLK | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
