2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 409 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 905 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |