2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 700 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (315 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |