2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 819 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (315 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2390 mm |