2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (167 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 400 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |