2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 475 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | E | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
