2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1976 Volvo 265

To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 445 kg more than 1976 Volvo 265.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 265. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 265.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mercedes-Benz E 1976 Volvo 265
Make Mercedes-Benz Volvo
Model E 265
Year Released 2003 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2148 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1845 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2660 mm