2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 655 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | E | Celica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 460 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |
