2003 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2003 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz E | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | E | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4690 mm |