2003 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML (232 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML (345 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
| Model | ML | 200 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3724 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2185 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
