2003 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 467 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
Model | SLR McLaren | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 618 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 334 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1768 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.5 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 107 L |