2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs. 1997 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,689 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (90 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 730 kg more than 1997 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo (185 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | 1997 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
| Model | Vaneo | MK VII |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1689 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2040 mm |
