2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 256 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (150 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | 2007 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | Vaneo | UTE |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |