2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Peugeot |
Model | Vaneo | RCZ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1359 mm |