2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (187 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (281 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (175 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | Viano | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2510 mm |