2003 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (210 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. (208 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis.

Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (542 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. (359 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mercury Grand Marquis 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
Make Mercury Mercedes-Benz
Model Grand Marquis R
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4604 cc 2987 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 208 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4250 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 359 Nm 542 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 5156 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1958 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1661 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 3216 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 80 L