2003 MG TF vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 595 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | TF | 600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2010 mm |