2003 MG TF vs. 1960 MG Magnett

To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 60 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (166 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.

Compare all specifications:

2003 MG TF 1960 MG Magnett
Make MG MG
Model TF Magnett
Year Released 2003 1960
Engine Size 1796 cc 1487 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 166 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3300 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 1140 kg
Vehicle Length 3950 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2530 mm