2003 MG TF vs. 1960 MG Magnett
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 60 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (166 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1960 MG Magnett | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | TF | Magnett |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |