2003 MG TF vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | MG | Plymouth |
Model | TF | Valiant |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |