2003 MG TF vs. 1968 MG MGC
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1968 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1968 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 174 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1968 MG MGC | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | TF | MGC |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2560 mm |