2003 MG TF vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 416 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | MG | ZAZ |
Model | TF | 966 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2170 mm |