2003 MG TF vs. 1972 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Nissan Cedric (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1972 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | TF | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |