2003 MG TF vs. 1984 Renault R5
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault R5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault R5 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1984 Renault R5. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault R5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 380 kg more than 1984 Renault R5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (145 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault R5. (76 Nm). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault R5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 1984 Renault R5 | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | TF | R5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1527 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 76 Nm |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |