2003 MG TF vs. 2000 Opel Omega

To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.

Compare all specifications:

2003 MG TF 2000 Opel Omega
Make MG Opel
Model TF Omega
Year Released 2003 2000
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1588 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 115 HP 305 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 1310 kg
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 52 L