2003 MG TF vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG TF | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | TF | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.8 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |