2003 MG TF vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. Both 2003 MG TF and 2010 Holden Cruze are equipped with a 1,796 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (166 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG TF | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | MG | Holden |
| Model | TF | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2685 mm |
