2003 MG TF vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (152 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 215 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.

Compare all specifications:

2003 MG TF 2010 Suzuki Equator
Make MG Suzuki
Model TF Equator
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Roadster Pickup
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 6900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 3950 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.5 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]