2003 MG ZR vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | ZR | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2540 mm |