2003 MG ZR vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZR weights approximately 295 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | ZR | 1100 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2380 mm |