2003 MG ZR vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 1964 MG MGC | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | ZR | MGC |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |