2003 MG ZR vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1368 kg more than 2003 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | ZR | Armada |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |