2003 MG ZR vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Nissan Livina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 57 kg more than 2003 MG ZR.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG ZR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | ZR | Livina |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 12.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 52 L |