2003 MG ZR vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 2010 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | MG | Opel |
Model | ZR | Combo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 80.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.8 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |