2003 MG ZT-T vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG ZT-T | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | MG | Suzuki |
| Model | ZT-T | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2060 mm |
