2003 MG ZT-T vs. 1973 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 665 kg more than 1973 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: